在線看
同款熱播
AUNTY當(dāng)網(wǎng)紅
為了亞當(dāng)
蕾雅·德呂蓋,安娜瑪麗亞·沃特魯梅,阿萊克斯·德斯卡,朱爾斯·德爾薩特,洛朗特·卡普洛托,克萊爾·博德森,索尼婭·貝卡姆,麥克斯·羅賓,阿德利安·迪安娜,米凱萊·莫安娜·內(nèi)德塔尼,亞歷山大·馬托比,杰登·穆約佐羅·馬耶巴,肯娜亞·索瑪,安妮·拉勒芒特,蒙尼亞·杜依布,吉尤利婭·巴爾福羅德,塞德里克·拉克辛,雅典娜·達(dá)納·珀羅斯,卡利姆·奇哈布,寶琳·格雷高利一如往常，護(hù)理師露西奔走于各個(gè)小兒科病房，BP機(jī)、哭喊聲填滿了她的崩潰日常。但今晚，有個(gè)小孩讓她格外心力交瘁：四歲的亞當(dāng)因營養(yǎng)不良入院觀察，他媽媽海蓓卡執(zhí)意要徹夜守在孩子身旁，偏偏她被法院裁定照顧失當(dāng)，不得長時(shí)間探訪。為了讓拒絕進(jìn)食的亞當(dāng)乖乖吃飯，露西打算破例讓她留下，豈料海蓓卡卻想悄悄偷走亞當(dāng)??
甜蜜與卑微
西恩·潘,薩曼莎·莫頓,Dan Moran,烏瑪·瑟曼,Brian Markinson故事發(fā)生在20世紀(jì)的30年代，雷（西恩·潘 Sean Penn 飾）是當(dāng)時(shí)紅極一時(shí)的爵士樂傳奇人物。由于早年生活困頓，成名后雷養(yǎng)成了揮金如土的惡習(xí)，壓抑許久的他放縱自己迷失在由金錢和美女組成的奢侈世界里?！ ∫晃幻泻５伲ㄋ_曼莎·莫頓 Samantha Morton 飾）的普通洗衣女工深深的愛上了雷，愿意為雷付出一切，而雷亦對(duì)單純的海蒂抱有好感?？墒?，此時(shí)的雷并不想過早的走入安定的家庭生活，更何況，雷可是一位藝術(shù)家啊，對(duì)于藝術(shù)家來說，婚姻難道不正是靈感的墳?zāi)箚幔烤瓦@樣，雷和海蒂漸行漸遠(yuǎn)。之后，雷娶了性感妖嬈的作家布蘭奇（烏瑪·瑟曼 Uma Thurman 飾），卻發(fā)現(xiàn)布蘭奇是比自己還要放浪形骸的“交際花”。直到此時(shí)，雷才想起了海蒂的好，可是雷沒有把握，這個(gè)單純可愛的女孩如今還會(huì)一如既往的包容他，接納他嗎？
三天
樸新陽,李民基,李來樸信陽飾演父親車勝道（音譯），李民基（李暋起）飾演潘神父（姓為音譯）?！ ≡撈v述在為女兒舉辦葬禮的三天時(shí)間中，與寄生在死去女兒心臟中突然蘇醒的惡魔進(jìn)行斗爭(zhēng)的超自然電影。
敲敲門
安娜·德·阿瑪斯,Lorenza Izzo,亞倫·伯恩斯小有名氣的建筑師埃文·韋伯（基努·里維斯 Keanu Reeves 飾）事業(yè)有成，生活美滿。他住在洛杉磯一套親手設(shè)計(jì)的別墅中，妻子凱倫（伊格納西·阿爾曼德 Ignacia Allamand 飾）美艷動(dòng)人，一雙兒女杰克（Dan Baily 飾）和莉莎（Megan Baily 飾）乖巧可愛。某個(gè)假日，凱倫驅(qū)車帶著孩子們外出度假，留下埃文一人在家中工作。瓢潑大雨之夜，艾文突然聽到了敲門聲。來者是被淋成落湯雞的女孩貝爾（安娜·德·阿瑪斯 Ana de Armas 飾）和吉妮絲（洛倫扎·伊佐 Lorenza Izzo 飾），他們迷失方向，請(qǐng)求埃文提供幫助。兩個(gè)女孩就像善解人意又誘惑媚人的小妖精，讓埃文多少有些把持不住。 色字頭上一把刀，世間哪有從天而降的美食和便宜……
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達(dá),卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚(yáng)·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.